- 规划与建设
- 文章编号：1009-6000(2025)08-0072-09
- 中图分类号：F291 文献标识码：B
- Doi：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2025.08.010
- 项目基金：“十四五”国家重点研发计划课题“低碳生态乡村社区建造关键技术研发与应用示范”（课题编号：2024Y F D1600402）；国家自然科学基金面上项目“城市生态网络与公共空间的耦合机理及其数字化规划方法研究”（项目批准号：52378046）。
- 作者简介：徐宁，博士，东南大学建筑学院景观学系副教授、副主任，博士生导师，研究方向为风景园林规划设计理论与方法，数字化城市设计理论与方法；
段皓然，硕士，东南大学，无锡市滨湖区城市管理局，研究方向为数字景观及其技术。
- 基于SolVES模型的城市边缘区生态系统服务社会价值评估——以南京市江宁区为例
- Assessing Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Urban Fringe Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study of Jiangning District in Nanjing
- 徐宁 段皓然
- XU Ning DUAN Haoran
- 摘要：
评估城市边缘区生态系统服务社会价值是促进其社会效益提升的基础，有助于区域景观风貌塑造、休闲旅游开发、历史遗产保护与科教事业发展，能够为城市和乡村提供全面持久的社会保障。文章以江宁区为例，通过引入恰当的环境变量，揭示不同环境要素与社会价值的相关关系及其对社会价值定量测度的重要性，比较居民与游客两大核心利益群体的感知异同，旨在准确评估并促进城市边缘区生态系统服务社会效益与复合价值的综合提升，为城市边缘区生态系统的规划与管理提供理论依据与决策支持。 - 关键词：
城市边缘区；生态系统服务；社会价值；感知差异；SolVES 模型 - Abstract: Assessing social values for ecosystem services in urban fringe areas is the basis for promoting their social benefits, which can contribute to the formation of the regional landscape, the cultivation of the recreational tourism, the conservation of historical heritage, and the establishment of scientific and educational endeavors. Furthermore, it can furnish all-encompassing and sustainable social protection for both urban and rural areas. This study employs the case of Jiangning district to incorporate relevant environmental elements and subsequently elucidate the relationship between these elements and social values, as well as their significance in quantitatively measuring social values. Lastly, we conduct a comparative analysis of the divergences and convergences in the viewpoints of two fundamental stakeholder cohorts, specifically inhabitants and visitors, with a view to accurately evaluating and promoting the comprehensive improvement of social benefits and composite values of ecosystem services in urban fringe areas, and providing theoretical basis and decision support for the planning and management of ecosystem in urban fringe areas.
- Key words: urban fringe; ecosystem services; social value; perceived differences; SolVES model