- 历史保护与更新
- 文章编号：1009-6000(2026)02-0023-08
- 中图分类号：TU982 文献标识码：B
- Doi：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2026.02.004
- 项目基金：昆明市第1至6批历史建筑保护及规划管理研究项目。
- 作者简介：曹睿康，昆明理工大学建筑与城市规划学院城乡规划硕士在读，研究方向为城市旧区更新设计；
周峰越，通信作者，昆明理工大学云南乡村振兴学院，院长，教授，博士生导师，注册城市规划师，美国圣何塞大学访问学者，研究方向为城市设计与新型城镇化、城乡人居环境设计、城市旧区更新设计、乡村振兴；
刘恒，昆明理工大学建筑与城市规划学院建筑学博士在读，研究方向为城市热环境及人体舒适度、城乡人居生态环境宜居性设计、绿色建筑。
- 历史建筑建成环境活力评价及可持续发展研究——以昆明市文明街片区历史建筑为例
- Evaluation of Built Environment Vitality and Sustainable Development of Historic Buildings: A Case Study of Historical Buildings in Wenming Street Area of Kunming
- 曹睿康 周峰越 刘恒
- CAO Ruikang ZHOU Fengyue LIU Heng
- 摘要：
在中国城市更新的背景下，历史建筑作为重要的城市物质文化遗产，其建成环境活力反映了物质空间与文化价值的动态交互，受社会、经济、交通与文化等多维影响，提升这一活力也是推动城市可持续发展的关键路径之一。文章以昆明市文明街片区 22处历史建筑为例，基于多源数据，运用熵权—TOPSIS 法，从经济功能、社会活动、文化资源与交通效能 4 个维度选取 11 个活力因子，构建历史建筑环境活力评价体系。研究发现：该片区历史建筑的交通效能与文化资源对综合活力协同影响显著，经济功能整体较弱，社会活动呈局部优势但系统性不足。依据评价结果，研究进一步提出 7类建筑分类标准，识别 4 类主要风险成因，并针对性提出“文创商业型”“文化教育型”“社区休闲型”“绿色生态型”4 类活化更新策略，以期为历史建筑的预防性保护、可持续发展及相关政策制定提供参考。 - 关键词：
历史建筑；建成环境；活力评价；可持续发展；多源数据 - Abstract: In the context of urban renewal in China, historic buildings serve as vital tangible cultural heritage assets. The vitality of their built environments reflects the dynamic interplay between physical spaces and cultural values, encompassing multidimensional influences spanning social, economic, transportation, and cultural dimensions. This vitality also represents a key pathway for advancing sustainable urban development. Taking 22 historic buildings on Wenming street in Kunming as a case study, this paper employs the Entropy Weighting-TOPSIS method based on multi-source data. It constructs an environmental vitality evaluation system for historic buildings by selecting 11 vitality factors across four dimensions: economic function, social activity, cultural resources, and transportation efficiency. Findings reveal that transportation efficiency and cultural resources significantly synergize to influence the comprehensive vitality of historic buildings in this area. Economic function remains relatively weak overall, while social activity exhibits localized strengths but lacks systemic coherence. Based on the evaluation results, the study further proposes seven categories of architectural classification standards, identifies four major risk factors, and offers targeted revitalization strategies, including “cultural and creative business”, “cultural education”, “community leisure”, and “green ecological” types. These strategies aim to provide references for the preventive conservation, sustainable development, and policy formulation of historic buildings.
- Key words: historic buildings; built environment; vitality assessment; sustainability development; multi-source data