- 南京研究
- 文章编号：1009-6000(2026)03-0010-08
- 中图分类号：TU984.11 文献标识码：B
- Doi：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2026.03.002
- 项目基金：2024年国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国城市转型发展的动力与机制研究” （24&ZD148）资助。
- 作者简介：李映雪，南京大学建筑与城市规划学院硕士研究生，研究方向为城市更新、城市与区域规划；
高煜，南京大学建筑与城市规划学院博士后，研究方向为城市更新、城市与区域规划；张京祥，通信作者，南京大学建筑与城市规划学院教授，博士生导师，南京大学空间规划研究中心主任，中国城市规划学会常务理事，主要研究方向为城市与区域规划。
- 从博弈到协同：社区自主更新的多中心治理策略——以南京市石榴新村为例
- From Gaming to Synergy: Polycentric Governance Strategies for Self-Initiated Regeneration: A Case Study of Shiliu New Village, Nanjing
- 李映雪 高煜 张京祥
- LI Yingxue GAO Yu ZHANG Jingxiang
- 摘要：
中国老旧社区的更新改造正在迈向自主更新的新阶段，多元主体的大量参与和权责关系的复杂化，使得老旧社区的更新改造陷入诸多实施困境，急需有效的治理策略予以回应。通过引入“多中心治理”的理论视角，文章揭示了当前社区更新过程中“政府—企业”“居民—居民”“居民—企业”等多组主体间的博弈僵局，是引致项目推进迟滞、资源分配失衡、自组织缺失等问题的核心因素。继而，以南京市石榴新村的自主更新为例，从多中心治理中“合作—竞争—合作”的协同框架，深入剖析其更新过程中政企、居民和民企等多元主体之间的博弈过程，以及走向多方协同的破解路径。最后，面向如何构建更为高效的社区自主更新模式，提出以完善治理制度与激励政策深化政企合作、以创新激励相容的实施方案化解居民竞争、以明确各主体法定权责关系实现民企共赢 3 个方面的治理创新策略，以期为中国社区的自主更新提供可借鉴的思路。 - 关键词：
博弈与协同；自主更新；多中心治理；社区治理；南京石榴新村 - Abstract: The renewal and transformation of China’s aging communities is moving toward a new stage of self-initiated regeneration. The extensive participation of multiple stakeholders and the increasing complexity of rights and responsibilities have led to numerous implementation dilemmas in community renewal, creating an urgent need for effective governance strategies. By introducing the theoretical perspective of polycentric governance, this study shows that negotiation deadlocks among multiple actors—including government–enterprise, resident–resident, and resident–enterprise relationships—are core factors leading to project delays, imbalanced resource allocation, and a lack of self-organization. Taking the self-initiated regeneration of Shiliu New Village in Nanjing as a case, the study analyzes the “cooperation–competition–cooperation” collaborative framework under polycentric governance, examining the bargaining processes among governments, enterprises, residents, and private actors during the renewal process, as well as pathways toward multi-party collaboration. Finally, to build a more efficient model of community self-initiated regeneration, three governance innovation strategies are proposed: deepening government–enterprise cooperation through improved governance institutions and incentive policies; mitigating resident competition through innovative incentive-compatible implementation schemes; and achieving win–win outcomes for private actors by clarifying the statutory rights and responsibilities of all parties. These measures aim to provide reference approaches for community self-initiated regeneration in China.
- Key words: game theory and cooperation; self-initiated regeneration; polycentric governance; community governance; Nanjing Shiliu New Village