- 规划创新思考与实践
- 文章编号:1009-6000(2016)04-0002-08
- 中图分类号:TU984 文献标识码:A
- Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2016.04.001
- 作者简介:许婵,北京大学城市与环境学院人文地理系博士研究生,研究方向为城市与区域规划;文天祚,北京大学城市与环境学院城市与区域规划系硕士研究生,研究方向为城市与区域规划;黄柏玮,北京大学城市与环境学院城市与区域规划系硕士研究生,研究方向为城市与区域规划;向岚麟,北京林业大学园林学院城乡规划系讲师。
- 后现代主义视角下的城市规划及其 对中国的启示
- Urban Planning under the Perspective of Postmodernism and its Implication for China
- 许婵 文天祚 黄柏玮 向岚麟
- XU Chan WEN Tianzuo HUANG Bowei XIANG Lanlin
- 摘要:
从后现代主义的内涵入手,指出了其两方面基本特征,即是对现代主义大叙事的质疑,是晚期资本主义的文化逻辑,并尝试归纳了其定义;继而剖析了现代主义城市规划和后现代主义城市规划的主要区别,指出后者相对于前者是以“反叛”对抗“理性”,以“博爱”对抗“狭隘”,以“多元”对抗“单一”,以“文脉”对抗“机械”。通过上述分析,得出后现代主义对现阶段中国城市规划的四方面启示,即规划主体从“长官化”到“人民化”的转向,规划目的从“高速化”到“高质化”的转向,规划方式从“蓝图化”到“过程化”的转向,及规划内容从“硬规划”到“软规划”的转向。 - 关键词:
后现代主义;中国;城市规划 - Abstract: Starting from the connotation of postmodernism, this paper points out that postmodernism both questions the grand narratives of modernism and is the cultural logic of late capitalism, arriving at a definition of postmodernism. It goes on to analyze the major difference between modern and postmodern urban planning and summarizes the main principles of postmodern urban planning, which is based on ¡°rebellion¡± against ¡°rationality¡±, ¡°philanthropism¡± against ¡°parochialism¡±, ¡°pluralism¡± against ¡°monolithism¡±, and ¡°context¡± against ¡°mechanism¡±. Under the above theoretical background and perspective, this paper concludes four implications for the urbanization and urban planning of China. In terms of planners, ¡°despotism¡± should be shifted into ¡°democratism¡±; in terms of planning purposes, ¡°speed-orientation¡± should be shifted into ¡°quality-orientation¡±; in terms of planning approaches, ¡°blueprint-orientation¡± should be shifted into ¡°process-orientation¡±, and in terms of planning content, ¡°physical planning¡± should be shifted into ¡°non-physical planning¡±.
- Key words: postmodernism; China; urban planning